SHC #2

The second thing that jumps out is that all of the more recent departees by spontaneous combustion have been described by the investigating authorities as "alcoholics".
Well, I'm here to tell you that I am an alcoholic in the view of the recovery industry, but my last drink was Dec 1/1994 so how is that relevant...?
Nobody can evaluate the state of mind & body of these folks in their last few months. The beating that alcohol puts on the mind & body after a while renders us more than willing to open our minds & accept that "there is more" and perhaps even listen to "guidance" from our "Inner Voice".
My brother in law is a veteran of the funeral business & his best estimate is 1-1.5 hours @ 1580F to completely toast a smallish (155lb) man like me.
It is not possible by any logic that a fire could burn that hot/that long without completely engulfing whatever building housed this monumental event.
Not possible - time to look further.......!

SHC #1

To the way of thinking of this student of spiritual concepts the phenomenon we call spontaneous human combustion is by far the least understood & most misinterpreted.
This " happening" stands alone in that there is photographic evidence. We could convict OJ with the photos we have of the Mary Reeser (1951) & Dr I. J. Bentley (1966) scenes as the fire investigators look through the rubble where the people were "consumed".
I have to ask the question: Could it not be a courtesy or even a compliment removing the possiblity of a 4 day old stinking corpse...? What is worse than a dead body...?
How many of us die alone....?
Even if we are successful @ maintaining a couples relationship, one probably goes before the other leaving one to die alone.
Does this phenomenon have to be bad...?